Axiom 1 is not a complete sentence!!



所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl

送交者: gyro 于 2006-3-30, 08:36:06:

回答: okay, here we go: 由 steven 于 2006-3-29, 23:38:28:

axiom 1) YT is a set of strings, and given a set of string S, where S U YT is YT.

Without "where" it makes sense. But then for arbitrary S not a subset of YT, S U YT > YT, so YT is not well defined yet. Assuming U stands for union of sets.

Perhaps you are trying to define YT recursively, starting with L2. Nice attempt, but we need more!



所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码(可选项): 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容(可选项):

URL(可选项):
URL标题(可选项):
图像(可选项):


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl