送交者: 虎子 于 2006-3-28, 00:08:03:

回答: 只需把上海户口名额减至十万既可 由 deadmeat 于 2006-3-27, 23:59:19:

民工的因素不可能考虑在内。这就像美国的GDP统计不可能把俺这个人头也算在分母
里是一样的道理。

• 上海不可能超出大陆其他地区太多，类似1930租界时期 - WT (32 bytes) 2006-3-28, 00:25:01
  • No point of talking about per capita GDP - skipper3 (221 bytes) 2006-3-28, 00:39:43
    • Exactly. That's why I think SH's per capita GDP is way above China's - 虎子 (198 bytes) 2006-3-28, 00:47:13
      • 上海船高，整个大陆也得水涨吧 - WT (95 bytes) 2006-3-28, 00:59:47
        • 你讲总量那当然不一样 - 虎子 (453 bytes) 2006-3-28, 01:14:40
          • 增长的极限在经济大国表现为增长率远低于后发展国家 - WT (72 bytes) 2006-3-28, 01:27:53
            • 考虑到石化能源的有限，俺同意你的说法 - 虎子 (88 bytes) 2006-3-28, 01:34:42
      • NO, it won't. THis will not happen and even it may happen the - skipper3 (186 bytes) 2006-3-28, 00:54:40
        • you mean the government would actually pull back the growth? - 虎子 (39 bytes) 2006-3-28, 01:00:24
          • The country is very big and complex, strange things happen. - skipper3 (50 bytes) 2006-3-28, 01:08:37
            • I can agree on the scale difference, but - 虎子 (313 bytes) 2006-3-28, 01:20:07
  • 刚去CIA网站查的资料，全中国大陆2005年人均GDP是6200美元， - 虎子 (182 bytes) 2006-3-28, 00:35:12
    • 14000RMB=6200$? - WT (187 bytes) 2006-3-28, 00:44:45
      • CIA有自己的一套算法(对物价、通膨的加权等) - 虎子 (176 bytes) 2006-3-28, 00:53:07
        • they use PPP. But the problem is the parity is based on - skipper3 (428 bytes) 2006-3-28, 01:03:30
          • 10K and 6.2K, that's 38% difference right there! Still quite a gap to me - 虎子 (0 bytes) 2006-3-28, 01:26:48

加跟贴