送交者: Latino2 于 2006-1-24, 10:54:50:

ISI发表英国学者在2000年到2004年所发表的学术论文统计。 用了两个指标：一是英国学者所发论文占世界所有学术论文的百分比(Percentage of papers from England)； 二是所发论文的引用次数与世界平均值的比较(Relative impact compared to world)。

这个衡量方法可供老中参考。老中抓SCI的同时， 应该将引用次数与世界平均值比较, 可以看出自己在哪个领域领先或落后。

=======================================
Science in England, 2000-04

Field % papers from UK IMF compared to world

Education 13.77 +5
Space Science 13.72 +40
Economics & Business 13.19 -5
Social Sciences 11.92 +6
Psychology/Psychiatry 10.35 +19
Geosciences 9.85 +37
Mol Bio & Genetics 9.45 +31
Neurosci & Behavior 9.37 +22
Immunology 9.05 +11
Clinical Medicine 9.04 +23
Microbiology 8.58 +24
Biology & Biochemistry 7.84 +23
..............

• http://in-cites.com/research/2005/november_14_2005-1.html

• Bad to see Economics & Business has less impact... - mangolasi (174 bytes) 2006-1-24, 14:37:38
  • because the sharp and smart ones are only interested in fancy modeling. :) - Latino2 (0 bytes) 2006-1-24, 15:02:15
    • After all, a run-down economy won't have much to show anyway. - Latino2 (0 bytes) 2006-1-24, 15:04:49
      • Not really true. Showing why it is run-down is definitely a big topic. - mangolasi (0 bytes) 2006-1-24, 15:22:29
• 政治错误，英独！ - fishman (100 bytes) 2006-1-24, 11:06:11
  • ISI 故意干的吧？ 瞧俺这阶级觉悟. :) - Latino2 (46 bytes) 2006-1-24, 11:48:49

加跟贴