ok


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: 唐好色 于 2007-01-17, 21:13:20:

回答: Saturation attack is a good doctrine 由 true 于 2007-01-17, 21:05:39:

Anti-saturation tactic must be cost effective. In other words, the means you use to shoot down the incoming saturation attach must be cheaper than the saturation attack.

The patriot missile defense system is a case in point. Taiwan tried to buy more, but the simple fact is that the Chinese attach missiles are a lot cheaper than these anti-missiles and the anti-missiles are not 100% effective. So the Chinese just need to match these batteries, missile for missile.




所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明)