Could you soly rely on <抗美援朝战争史> for the fact? Have you
所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛
送交者: 何人可 于 2007-01-05, 19:21:47:
回答: 这个不过是个新闻报道 由 揍汉奸 于 2007-01-05, 19:15:12:
varified the fact with other sources? If not, please do so and then come back to the discussion. Thanks!
所有跟贴:
- 呵呵，我至少还有本书作为讨论的依据 - 揍汉奸 (20 bytes) 2007-01-05, 19:30:05 (118838)
- Wrong information hurts much worse than no information at all! (无内容) - 何人可 (0 bytes) 2007-01-05, 19:33:16 (118841)
- 呵呵，您以为您是谁？ - 揍汉奸 (61 bytes) 2007-01-05, 20:19:33 (118859)
- 除了说明你在胡说后才找的资料还能说明什么？ - janz (94 bytes) 2007-01-06, 12:48:08 (118965)
- Please see my new post above. Thanks! (无内容) - 何人可 (0 bytes) 2007-01-06, 05:22:14 (118930)
- 你愿意相信什么，说什么都行，最少也要拿出一些有分量的证据再说话。 - janz (56 bytes) 2007-01-06, 05:17:04 (118929)
- Even a nobody should have the rights to express doubts on something fishy. (无内容) - 何人可 (0 bytes) 2007-01-06, 02:14:31 (118922)
- 任何一只军队的战史都有错误 - 揍汉奸 (220 bytes) 2007-01-06, 00:27:15 (118912)
- 跟错了，是给何人可的。 - janz (116 bytes) 2007-01-05, 23:28:31 (118904)
- 真无聊，你要是觉得资料不对，去找出正确的反驳他啊？ - janz (120 bytes) 2007-01-05, 23:25:25 (118903)
- 对中国方面的史料, I don't always 抱定死不承认的态度. But, this time, - 何人可 (364 bytes) 2007-01-05, 23:19:43 (118902)
- 土共方面的战史确实有很多错 - 揍汉奸 (310 bytes) 2007-01-05, 21:08:27 (118873)
- The track record of the mainland publications made me think so. (无内容) - 何人可 (0 bytes) 2007-01-05, 20:32:04 (118865)
加跟贴