you are correct, but all dynamic activities in dead things


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: 華有缺 于 2007-01-02, 20:54:27:

回答: Strongly disagree! 由 lijun 于 2007-01-02, 20:30:12:

come down to the basic chemicall reactions also, right?

Then why some things is dead, some things are alive. So understanding the basic chemicall reactions is not
enough. In solid physics, there is a saying, "more is different", we are trying to understand the behavior of
a complex system, reductionism won't give us the big picture. It helps us to understand, but not the answer.




所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明)