at least, advocating pseudo-science is not good for our environment.

In many cases, people advocating pseudo-science are making profits from it. They manipulate the thought of the public, induce (spiritual, in most cases) "pseudo-needs"and create markets for their services/products.

Then they sell "service" of exceptional prices to people whose minds have been manipulated and who have acquired the induced "needs" from un-intended exposure to these advocacies.

Scientists have the responsibility to alert governments and general public.