it is hard to confirm or deny this claim.


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: steven 于 2006-12-13, 23:38:20:

回答: 转一个“鑫诺惨剧的吊诡“,写的有点玄,细节太多,内行指导一下 由 At@ 于 2006-12-13, 16:13:12:

After battling with Chinese terminologies for quite a while, I think I got most of it. The desciption here is very general, most of the SV deploying process are very similar. Since we don't have the telemetry, which should be continuously sent back to the ground control from the SV, of the SINOSAT 2, we have no way to verify this analysis. However, most part does sound reasonable. This one is much better than http://航天某院曝鑫诺2号失败黑幕. If I am not mistaken what 火工品短路 means, it is almost impossible to tell if a satellite has wire bonding problem. The telemetry won't tell anything about that, it only tell the ground control certain parts are not responding, which could have many different problems.



所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明)