送交者: stocknh 于 2006-10-04, 09:58:06:

回答: 近代（１８００－１９００）的人均寿命, 孙思邈 > 100 由 Wood 于 2006-10-04, 09:56:15:

• 你自己不是明白么? (无内容) - Wood (0 bytes) 2006-10-04, 10:06:30 (105792)
  • 连普通文都读不通的Wood应该先来跟我学学中文 - stocknh (44 bytes) 2006-10-04, 10:19:49 (105795)
    • 您是什么意思? 我这儿跟您学习来了,天底下您找不着比我虚心的学生 (无内容) - Wood (0 bytes) 2006-10-04, 10:24:48 (105797)
      • Ok, here is my point...... - stocknh (230 bytes) 2006-10-04, 10:40:07 (105804)
        • 人均寿命从五十度提高到七八十,这里头中医没做什么贡献 (无内容) - Wood (0 bytes) 2006-10-04, 10:48:47 (105806)
          • I did NOT argue whether "这里头中医没做什么贡献" ...... - stocknh (253 bytes) 2006-10-04, 12:05:34 (105819)
            • 不说别的,新生儿死亡率的下降归功于现代围产医学,与中医无关 (无内容) - blackbox (0 bytes) 2006-10-04, 14:11:18 (105839)
            • I was not trying to following your point, - Wood (35 bytes) 2006-10-04, 13:30:48 (105832)
      • Then read my post one more time, please...... :-) (无内容) - stocknh (0 bytes) 2006-10-04, 10:33:05 (105802)
        • 我的这位恩师,我有把您刚开头写的读了一遍,没看出什么新鲜的来 - Wood (375 bytes) 2006-10-04, 10:43:27 (105805)
          • www.xys.org/forum/db/1/159/249.html --- :-) (无内容) - stocknh (0 bytes) 2006-10-04, 12:14:14 (105822)

加跟贴