There are americans who think Honoré de Balzac is a great writer


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: 匆匆过客 于 2006-09-15, 13:35:14:

回答: 文笔粗糙不标新立异,故事不新奇,罗曼史很少,内心也不算细腻,钩心斗角的多。。。 由 mangolasi 于 2006-09-15, 10:00:50:

ZT from http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9501E3DD153FF933A05757C0A9609C8B63
A Question of Honoré

Published: April 30, 2006

To the Editor:

I was shocked to find that James Wood, in his review of Frederick Brown's ''Flaubert: A Biography'' (April 16), could posit the notion that the modern novel began with Gustave Flaubert. Flaubert's role in the development of realism was profound, to be sure, but he was without question a figure in the second generation of modern novelists, not the first. For my money, the first generation can be summed up in a single name: Honoré de Balzac. It saddens but doesn't surprise me to learn that young people and even many book lovers and serious literature students neglect the more than 100 interlocking novels and stories that make up Balzac's ''Comédie Humaine,'' but I certainly expected more from the Book Review. The idea that Balzac's work represents the beginning of the modern novel as we know it is admittedly a tough sell, but to claim that it began with Flaubert is simply absurd.

James Walling

Portland, Ore.

and James Wood's review of Frederick Brown's ''Flaubert: A Biography'' can be found at http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/16/books/review/16wood.html?ex=1158465600&en=5dbcb1c5989d0bbb&ei=5070




所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明)