So your "有记者说" was not correct.


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: lookat 于 2006-09-06, 11:46:15:

回答: obviously you didn't read carefully 由 eng 于 2006-09-06, 11:07:09:

But now I don't want to argue on this.

At least in Xinhuanet, you know who is responsible for the report. The reports have thier names there. But this random post is just a piece of shit.

"杨乐院士认为,用比例来定量描述各国科学家为破解庞加莱猜想所做的贡献,或者将我国科学家的300多页论文类比成“长篇小说”,“都不完全确切,我也不同意。但是,中国科学家确实做出了‘突出贡献’。” "
--- One can say that Yang changed his mind the other day.

I also zt-ed another report, Yau said "30%" himself.

In addition, the guy "jxh" has very doubtful credit. He defended for 刘克峰,bla bla..., but when I ask him some evidence on how "这种类似SEMINAR的讲解是如何影响9位菲尔兹奖评委的", he did not reply a word. I doubt on his credit even it is just a zt.




所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明)