these are bullshit, the author has no idea what formal language

送交者: steven 于 2006-09-01, 02:05:49:

回答: The bottom-up/top-down models, learning and consciousness 由 insight 于 2006-09-01, 01:45:54:

computability and etc means. Don't quote things like this, if you really want to understand what godel's incompleteness theorems mean, go and find a mathematical logic book and read it. You have to at least spend a semester to learn about it. This is not the way to bear witness for the Lord.

所有跟贴:

Hey man, this is my creation. What is yours? show it. (无内容) - insight (0 bytes) 2006-09-01, 02:07:26 (100393)
- again, regardless who created those, bullshit still bullshit. - steven (364 bytes) 2006-09-01, 02:14:09 (100394)
  - I believe you are a meat machine - insight (153 bytes) 2006-09-01, 02:18:36 (100395)
    - whatever can be solve my mathematics, regardless human or machine - steven (284 bytes) 2006-09-01, 02:26:38 (100398)
      - Of course, the machine is deterministic. - insight (185 bytes) 2006-09-01, 02:34:58 (100400)
        
        同意你的观点 - hahahehe (271 bytes) 2006-09-01, 08:51:56 (100423)
        
        一脑浆糊。 (无内容) - JFF (0 bytes) 2006-09-01, 08:29:22 (100419)
        
        Einstein didn't believe a personified God, so don't quote him. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2006-09-01, 03:00:21 (100405)
        
        Einstine had never said "上帝不用玩骰子，因为他有无限的知识" - steven (467 bytes) 2006-09-01, 02:58:56 (100404)
        
        that is why 爱因思坦说：上帝是不玩骰子的 (无内容) - insight (0 bytes) 2006-09-01, 02:52:48 (100403)
        
        爱因思坦说：上帝是不玩骰子的 - insight (1254 bytes) 2006-09-01, 02:51:54 (100402)
        
        You think Netwon's law ensure deterministics? Before throwing a dice, - steven (736 bytes) 2006-09-01, 02:48:59 (100401)

加跟贴