A Missle Destroyer is Cheaper than a Battleship, but ......



所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl

送交者: daye 于 2006-7-09, 22:21:32:

回答: btw, regarding "战列舰舰炮还是比飞机和导弹方便便宜" is actually wrong, 由 steven 于 2006-7-09, 10:26:05:

A current destroyer may be more powerful than a WWI battleship, but may not be so comparing to a WWII battleship which having gone through modernization.

USS Wisconsin:
16 AGM-84 Harpoon anti-ship missiles;
32 BGM-109 Tomahawk missiles;
4 Phalanx Close in Weapon Systems;
9 16" Mark 7 guns;
12 5" Mark 12 guns;
8 RQ-2 Pioneer Unmanned Aerial Vehicles;






所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码(可选项): 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容(可选项):

URL(可选项):
URL标题(可选项):
图像(可选项):


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl